Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Verma, Subhash
- Assessment of the Common Methods for Diagnosis of Bovine Subclinical Mastitis
Abstract Views :252 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, Dr. GC Negi College of Veterinary and Animal Scieces, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidalya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, Dr. GC Negi College of Veterinary and Animal Scieces, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidalya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 42, No 2 (2016), Pagination: 170-174Abstract
A total of 69 lactating Jersey crossbred cows of an organised dairy farm were examined for the presence of subclinical mastitis. The diagnosis of subclinical mastitis was done on the basis of somatic cell count (SCC) in the milk samples. The other methods of diagnosis of subclinical mastitis such as California Mastitis Test (CMT), Bromothymol Blue (BTB) test, microbial culture and milk yield evaluation were also performed. Different tests revealed variable results. It was found that although these diagnotic methods correlated linearly with SCC but not fully. CMT and BTB failed to detect the presence of subclinical mastitis in 10 and 24 percent cases, respectively; where SCC was more than 0.4 million cells/ml. However, twenty percent of cows were harboring pathogenic bacteria without any abnormal change in SCC, whereas in 41 percent cows, a high somatic cell count was observed in the absence of any bacteria. Furthermore, daily milk yield had a negative but weak correlation with SCC. No difference in the presence of various milk proteins were revealed by SDS-PAGE in the milk samples containing 0.2, 0.7, 1.3 million cells/ml, respectively. Thus, it was concluded that the correlation between the different methods of testing subclinical mastitis is tenuous and as such none of the tests may be regarded as confirmatory for the diagnosis of subclinical mastitis. This study suggests the development of alternative methods for achieving the confirmatory diagnosis of subclinical mastitis.Keywords
Subclinical Mastitis, Somatic Cell Counting, California Mastitis Test, Bromothymol Blue Test, Microbial Culturing of Milk.References
- Akers RM. 2002. Lactation and Mammary Gland. Iowa State Press, America. 278 p.
- Biggadike HJ, Ohnstad I, Laven RA and Hillerton JE. 2002. Evaluation of measurements of the conductivity of quarter milk samples for the early diagnosis of mastitis. Veterinary Record 150: 655-658.
- Bramley AJ. 1992. Mastitis. In: Bovine Medicine-Diseases and husbandry of cattle (eds. Andrews AH, Blowey RW, Boyd H and Eddy RG). Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, 289-300.
- Broom DM and Fraser AF. 2007. Domestic animal behavior and welfare. Fourth Edition. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.
- Carter GR. 1995. Diagnostic Procedures in Veterinary Bacteriology and Mycology. 5th edition Springfield, USA.
- Cruickshank R, Duguid JP, Marmion BP and Swain RHA.. 1975. Medical Microbiology. 12th Edition. Vol.1& 2 Churchill Livingston, Maryland.
- Daley MJ, Oldham ER, Williams TJ and Coyle PA. 1991. Quantitative and qualitative properties of host polymorphonuclear cells during experimentally induced Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in cows. American Journal of Veterinary Research 52: 474-479.
- Daniel WW. 1990. Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Applied Nonparametric Statistics (2nd ed.). Boston: PWSKent. pp. 358–365.
- Degraves FJ and Fetrow J. 1993. Economics of mastitis and mastitis control. Veterinary Clinics of North America-Food Animal Practice 9: 421-434.
- Dingwell RT, Leslie KE, Schukken YH, Sargeant JM and Timms LL. 2003. Evaluation of the California mastitis test to detect an intramammary infection with a major pathogen in early lactation dairy cows. Canadian Veterinary Journal 44: 413-416.
- Halasa T, Huijps K, Osteras O and Hogveen H. 2007. Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: a review. Veterinary Quarterly 29: 18-31
- Halasa T, Nielen M, De Roos AP, Van DE Hoorne R, DE Jong G, Lam TJGM, Werven T V and Hogveen H. 2009. Production loss due to new subclinical mastitis in Dutch dairy cows estimated with a test-day model. Journal of Dairy Science 92: 599-606.
- Harmon RJ 1994. Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science 77: 2103-2112.
- Hendriksen RS, Mevius DJ, Schroeter A and Teale C. 2008. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among bacterial pathogens isolated from cattle in different European countries: 2002–2004. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 50:28 doi:10.1186/1751-0147-50-28.
- Hillerton JE. 1999. Redefining mastitis based on somatic cell count. International Dairy Federation (IDF) Bulletin 345: 4-6.
- Hortet P and Seegers H. 1998. Loss in milk yield and related composition changes resulting from clinical mastitis in dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 37: 1-20.
- Hortet P, Beaudeau F, Seegers H and Fourichon C. 1999. Reduction in milk yield associated with somatic cell counts up to 600 000 cells/ml in French Holstein cows without clinical mastitis. Livestock Production Science 61: 33-42.
- Houben EHP, Dijkhuizen AA, Vanarendok JAM and Huirne RBM. 1993. Short-term and long-term production losses and repeatability of clinical mastitis in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 76 : 2561-2578.
- Huijps K, Lam TJ and Hogveen H. 2008. Costs of mastitis: Facts and perception. Journal of Dairy Research 75: 113-120.
- Malinowski E. 2001. Somatic cells in milk. Med Weter 57: 13-17.
- Mattila T, Pyrola S and Sandholm M. 1986. Comparison of milk antitrypsin, albumin, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, somatic cells and bacteriological analysis as indicators of bovine subclinical mastitis. Veterinary Research Commun 21: 655-658
- Mitchell JM, Griffiths MW and Mcewen SA. 1998. Antimicrobial drug residues in milk and meat: causes, concerns, prevalence, regulations, tests and test performance. Journal of Food Protection 61 : 742-756.
- Moretain JP and Boisseau J. 1989. Excretion of penicillins and cephalexin in bovine milk following intramammary administration. Food Add Contamin 6:79-90.
- Presscot JF and Breed RS. 1910. The determination of number of body cells in milk by a direct method. Journal of Infectious Diseases 7: 632-640.
- Pyorala S. 2003. Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. Veterinary Research 34: 565-578.
- Pyorala S and Pyorala E. 1997. Accuracy of methods using somatic cell count and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase activity in milk to assess the bacteriological cure of bovine clinical mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 80: 2820-2825.
- Rajala-Schultz PJ, Grohn YT, McCulloch CE and Guard CL. 1999. Effects of clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 1213-1220.
- Schepers AJ, Lam TJ, Schukken YH, Wilmink JB and Hanekamp WJ. 1997. Estimation of variance components for somatic cell counts to determine thresholds for uninfected quarters. Journal of Dairy Science 80:1833-1840.
- Sears PM, Smith BS, Eglish PB, Herer PS and Gonzalez RN. 1990. Shedding pattern of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine intramammary infection. Journal of Dairy Science 73: 27852789.
- Varshney JP and Naresh R. 2004. Evaluation of homeopathic complex in the clinical management of udder diseases of riverine buffaloes. Homeopathy 93:17.
- Webster J. 1999. Animal Welfare. A Cool Eye Towards Eden. First Edition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd.
- Wilson DJ, Gonzalez RN, Hertl JA, Schulte HF, Bennett GJ, Schukken YH and Grohn YT. 2004. Effect of clinical mastitis on the lactation curve: A mixed model estimation using daily milk weights. Journal of Dairy Science 87: 2073-2084.
- Pasteurellosis in Animals of Himachal Pradesh
Abstract Views :182 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Mandeep Sharma
1,
Aneesh Thakur
1,
Prasenjit Dhar
1,
Rajesh Chahota
1,
Shailja Katoch
1,
Subhash Verma
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Veterinary Microbiology, DGCN College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Veterinary Microbiology, DGCN College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 40, No 2 (2014), Pagination: 99-109Abstract
Pasteurella multocida is responsible for major animal diseases of economic importance in both developed and developing countries including India. The prevalence of pasteurellosis has been documented in India as well as in the state of Himachal Pradesh where disease outbreaks from different agro-climatic regions have been reported. Aiming at increased knowledge of these infections in Himachal Pradesh, we employed the conventional methods and advanced molecular methods for culturing, characterization, capsular serotyping, and analysis of virulence factors for rapid epidemiological investigation and pathogenicity of Pasteurella multocida infections in H.P. Vaccine-induced protective biomarkers were also studied using advanced immunological techniques. We also summarize our efforts to enhance the ability to rapidly diagnose clinical infections and to prevent and control pasteurellosis by validation of vaccines.Keywords
Haemorrhagic Septicaemia, Pasteurella multocida, Diagnostics, Typing, Virulence Factors, Vaccines.- Detection of Haemoprotozoa in Cows and Buffaloes in Kangra District of Himachal Pradesh
Abstract Views :207 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Jyoti Jaryal
1,
Ajay Katoch
1,
Sanjeev Kumar
1,
Kritika Dhial
1,
Mandeep Sharma
1,
Prasenjit Dhar
1,
Rajesh Chahota
1,
Subhash Verma
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Veterinary Microbiology, DGCN College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur - 176 062, IN
1 Department of Veterinary Microbiology, DGCN College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur - 176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 44, No 1&2 (2018), Pagination: 103-108Abstract
In this study, a total of 57 blood samples from cows and buffaloes showing clinical signs of high fever, anemia and/or swollen lymph nodeswere screened for haemoprotozoan infections using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Some asymptomatic animals were also included in the study. Out of 57 blood samples, 14 samples were positive for either one or the other haemoprotozoa reflecting an overall prevalence of 24.56%. A total of nine samples of which six from cows and three from buffaloes were positive for Theileria annulata and five samples all from cows were found positive for mixed infection of Babesia bovis and Anaplasma marginale. This study shows that haemoprotozoan infections are common in cows and buffaloes population of Kangra District of Himachal Pradeshdue to conduciveenvironmental conditions for survival of vectors responsible for carrying these infectious agents. PCR technique showed high sensitivity and specificityup to species level, as it not only detected the haemoprotozoan infections in active cases but also in asymptomatic carrier animals.Keywords
Anaplasma marginale, Babesia bovis, Bovine Haemoprotozoan, Himachal Pradesh, Kangra, PCR.References
- Ala L and Wayne J. 2005. Molecular approaches to detect and study the organisms causing bovine tick borne diseases: babesiosis and anaplasmosis. African Journal of Biotechnology 4: 292-302.
- Altay K, Aydin MF, Dumanli N and Aktas M. 2008. Molecular detection of Theileria and Babesia infections in cattle. Veterinary Parasitolology 158: 295–301.
- Ashuma SA, Singla LD, Kaur P, Bal MS, Batth BK and Juyal PD. 2013. Prevalence and haematobiochemical profile of Anaplasma marginale infection in dairy animals of Punjab (India). Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 6: 139-144.
- Bilgic HB, Karagenc T, Shiels B, Tait A, Eren H and Weir W. 2010. Evaluation of cytochromeb as a sensitive target for PCR based detection of T. annulata carrier animals. Veterinary Parasitolology 174: 341–347.
- Bilgic HB, Karagenç T, Simuunza M,Shiels B, Tait A, Eren H and Weir W. 2013.Development of a multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Theileria annulata, Babesia bovis and Anaplasma marginale in cattle. Experimental Parasitology 133 (2): 222–229.
- Bose R, Jorgensen WK, Dalgliesh RJ, Friedhoff KT and de Vos AJ. 1995. Current state and future trends in the diagnosis of babesiosis. Veterinary Parasitolology 57: 61-74.
- Brown CG. 1990. Control of tropical theileriosis (Theileria annulata infection) of cattle. Parasitologia 32 (1): 23-31.
- Callow LL, Rogers RJ, de Vos AJ. 1993. Tick-borne diseases: cattle pathology and serology. In: Corner LA, Bagust TJ (eds.), Australian Standard Diagnostic Techniques for Animal Diseases. CSIRO Information Services, East Melbourne: 116.
- Gale KR, Dimmock CM, Gartside M and Leatch G. 1996. Anaplasma marginale: detection of carrier cattle by PCR ELISA. International Journal of Parasitolology 26: 1103-1109.
- Gasser RB. 2006. Molecular tools - Advances, opportunities and prospects.Veterinary Parasitolology 136 (2): 69-89.
- Guan G, Moreau E, Liu J, Hao X and Luo J. 2010. Molecular evidence of experimental transmission to sheep by Haemaphysalis qinghaiensis and Haemaphysalis longicornis. Parasitology International 59: 265–267.
- JithendranKP. 1997. Blood protista of cattle and buffaloes in Kangra Valley, Himachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 67 (3): 207-208.
- Juyal PD, Singla LD, Kaur P,Tandon V andDhawan BN. 2005. Management of surra due to Trypanosoma evansi in India: An overview. Infectious diseases of domestic animals and zoonosis in India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, India 75: 109–120.
- Kakati P, Sarmah PC, Bhattacharjee K, Bhuyan D and Baishya BC. 2015. Molecular detection and associated pathogenesis in a fatal case of Theileria orientalis infection in India: Probable circulation of a virulent strain and stress associated factors. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research 6: 4235-4239.
- Laha R, Mondal B, Biswas SK, Chand K, Das M, Sarma D, Goswami A and Sen A. 2015. Detection of Babesia bigemina infection in cattle from northeastern India by polymerase chain reaction and its genetic relatedness with other isolates. Tropical Animal Health and Production 47 (3): 633-636.
- Maharana BR, Tewari AK, Saravanan BC and Sudhakar NR. 2016.Important haemoprotozoan diseases of livestock: Challenges in current diagnostics and therapeutics: An update. Veterinary World 9 (5): 487-495.
- Nair AS, Ravindran R, Lakshmanan B, Kumar SS, Tresamol PV, Saseendranath MR, Senthilvel K, Ra o JR, Te w a ri A K a n d G h o s h S . 2011.Haemoprotozoa of cattle in northern Kerala, India. Tropical Biomedicine 28 (1): 68-75.
- Noaman V and Shayan P. 2010. Comparison of microscopy and PCR-RFLP for detection of Anaplasma marginale in carrier cattle. Iranian Journal of Microbiology 2 (2): 89.
- Noaman V. 2014. Comparison of molecular and microscopic technique for detection of Theileria spp. in carrier cattle. J. parasit. Dis.38 (1): 64-67.
- Norval RAI, Perry BD and Young AS. 1992.The epidemiology of theileriosis in Africa. ILRI (aka ILCAand ILRAD).
- Salih DA, El Hussein AM and Singla LD. 2015. Diagnostic approaches for tick-borne haemoparasitic diseases in livestock. Journal Veterinary Medicine Animal Health 7 (2): 45-56.
- Shahnawaz S, Ali M, Aslam MA, Fatima R, Chaudhry ZI, Hassan MU, Ali M and Iqbal F. 2011. A study on the prevalence of a tick transmitted pathogen, the hematological profile of cattle from Southern Punjab (Pakistan). Parasitology Research 109 (4): 1155– 1160.
- Sharma P, Juyal PD, Singla LD, Chachra D and Pawar H. 2012.Diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi in cattle and buffaloes by employing real time PCR using TaqMan assay. Veterinary Parasitology 190: 375-382.
- Singh H, Mishra AK, Rao JR and Tewari AK. 2007. A PCR assay for detection of Babesia bigemina infection using clotted blood in bovines. Journal of Applied Animal Research 32 (2): 201-202.
- Soundararajan C and RajaveluG. 2006. Prevalence of haemoprotozoan among cattle and buffaloes. Indian Veterinary Journal 83 (12):1258-1260.
- Terkawi MA, Thekisoe OM, Katsande C, Latiff AA, Mans BJ, Matthee O, Mkize N, Mabogoane N, Marais F, Yokoyama N, Xuan X and Igarashi I. 2011. Serological survey of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina in cattle in South Africa. Veterinary Parasitolology 182: 337-342.
- Tewari AK, Ray D, Mishra AK and Bansal GC. 2011. Identification of immunodominant polypeptides common between Babesia bigemina and Theileria annulata. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 71: 679–680.
- TripathiAK, Srivastava AK andPandey SN. 1993. Advances in Environmental Sciences. APH Publishing pp 111-128.
- Uilenberg G. 2006. Babesia-a historical overview. Veterinary Parasitology 138 (1-2): 3-10.
- Velusamy R, Rani N, Ponnudurai G, Harikrishnan TJ, Anna T, Arunachalam K, Senthilvel K and Anbarasi P. 2014. Influence of season, age and breed on prevalence of haemoprotozoan diseases in cattle of Tamil Nadu, India. Veterinary World 7: 574–578.
- Ybanez AP, Sivakumar T, Ybanez RD, Ratilla JC, Perez ZO, Gabotero SR, Hakimi H, KawazuS, Matsumoto K, Yokoyama N and Inokuma H. 2013. First Molecular Characterization of Anaplasma marginale in Cattle and Rhipicephalus(Boophilus) microplus Ticks in Cebu Philippines. Journal of Veterinary & Medical Science 75: 27-36.
- Isolation and Adaptational Studies of Native Sheeppox Virus Strains in Lamb Testicular and Vero Cell Culture Systems
Abstract Views :78 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Tania Gupta
1,
Vanita Patial
1,
Prasenjit Dhar
1,
Subhash Verma
1,
Mandeep Sharma
1,
Rajesh Chahota
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Dr. G.C. Negi College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Dr. G.C. Negi College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishwavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 47, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 77-83Abstract
Sheeppox is a highly contagious disease of sheep causing huge economic losses to the sheep industry and farmers rearing the livestock. Himachal Pradesh has large population of sheep reared by the different rural communities. In recent years, outbreaks of sheep pox have become frequent causing huge economical losses to sheep breeders. Isolation, identification and characterization of circulating Sheeppox virus (SPV) strains is required to initiate efforts for disease control and prevention. The aim of the present study was to establish the best cell culture-based isolation system by comparing the growth of SPV field strains from Himachal Pradesh in lamb testicular (LT) cells and continuous Vero cell line. The results showed that LT cell culture is more suited for primary isolation of SPV field strains as compared to Vero cells. But virus can be adapted to Vero cell line after 5 blind passages. Thus, it was concluded that LT cell culture, though tedious, should be preferred for primary isolation of SPV field strains.Keywords
Sheeppox Virus, LT Cell Culture, Vero Cell Line.References
- Aygün ST. 1959. The propagation of variola ovina in sheep embryonic tissue cultures and its usefulness as a vaccine against this disease. Archiv fur Experimentelle Veterinarmedizin 9.
- Batta MK, Katoch RC, Mandeep S, Joshi VB and Nagal KB. 1999. Epidemiological observation on goatpox in Himachal Pradesh. Indian Veterinary Journal 76 (8):683-684.
- Babiuk S, Parkyn G, Copps J, Larence JE, Sabara MI, Bowden TR, Boyle DB and Kitching RP. 2007. Evaluation of an ovine testis cell line (OA3. Ts) for propagation of Capripoxvirus isolates and development of an immunostaining technique for viral plaque visualization. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 19 (5):486-91.
- Bhanuprakash V, BK Indrani, Hosamani, M and Singh RK. 2006. The current status of sheep pox disease. Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Disease 29 (1):27-60.
- Boue A, Baltazard M and Vieuchange J. 1957. Culture du virus de la clavelée sur cultures de tissus 244 (11):15713.
- Cilli, V, and Baldelli, B. 1959. Behaviour of sheeppox virus in tissue cultures of sheep testicular cells. Proc. XVIth Inter. veto Congr. 2:455.
- Coakley W and Capstick PB. 1961. Protection of cattle against lumpy skin disease. Research in Veterinary Science12:123-7.
- Hosamani M, Nandi S, Mondal B, Singh RK, Rasool TJ and Bandyopadhyay SK. 2004. A Vero cell-attenuated Goatpox virus provides protection against virulent virus challenge. Acta Virologica 48 (1):15-21.
- Jassim FA, FA J. 1982. Propagation of sheeppox virus in cell culture. http://pascal.francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=PASCAL82X 0344425
- King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB and Lefkowitz EJ. 2012. Virus Taxonomy – Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Academic Press, San Diego, CA. pp291-309.
- Kirubaharan JJ, Sugirtha AP and Padmanaban VD. 1993. Adaptation of Sheep Pox Virus (Ranipet Strain) to BHK-21 cell-line. Indian Veterinary Journal 70 (1):4.
- Malik Y, Khatri M, Batra SK and Chand P. 1997. Occurrence of sheep pox in unorganized flocks in Haryana State. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 67 (11):962-3.
- Mateva V. 1976. Cultivation and studying the properties of the sheep pox virus, strain Perego, in a heterologous tissue. Veterinarnomedit þs!þinski nauki
- Mirzaie K, Barani SM and Bokaie S. 2015. A review of sheep pox and goat pox: Perspective of their control and eradication in Iran. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Animal Research 2 (4):373-381.
- Pandey R and Singh IP. 1970. Cytopathogenicity and neutralisation of sheep pox virus in primary cell culture of ovine and caprine origin. Indian Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 13:6-11.
- Plowright W and Ferris RD. 1958. The growth and cytopathogenicity of sheep-pox virus in tissue cultures. British Journal of Experimental Pathology 39 (4):424.
- Ramyar H and Hessami M. 1967. Development of an attenuated live virus vaccine against sheep pox. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin Reihe B 14 (6):516-519.
- Sharma R, Patil RD, Parimoo HA, Thakur D and Katoch VC. 2013. Clinio-pathology of sheep pox disease in Himachal Pradesh, India. Ruminant Science 2(2):127-130.
- -
- Soman JP and Singh IP. 1980. Cytopathic and immunogenic studies of sheep pox virus serially cultivated in cell culture. Journal of Comparative Pathology 90 (1):99-106.
- Trabelsi K, Majoul S, Rourou S and Kallel H. 2014. Process intensification for an enhanced replication of a newly adapted RM-65 sheep pox virus strain in Vero cells grown in stirred bioreactor. Biochemical Engineering Journal 90:131-9.
- Verma S, Verma LK, Gupta VK, Katoch VC, Dogra V, Pal B and Sharma M. 2011. Emerging Capripoxvirus disease outbreaks in Himachal Pradesh, a Northern State of India. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 58 (1):79-85.
- Evaluation of Different Components of Natural Farming in Black Gram (Vigna mungo L.) Under Mid Hill Conditionsof Himachal Pradesh
Abstract Views :87 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Nasratullah
1,
Rameshwar Kumar
1,
Sandeep Manuja
1,
Raj Paul Sharma
1,
G. D. Sharma
1,
Subhash Verma
2
Affiliations
1 Department of Organic Agriculture and Natural Farming, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
2 Department of Veterinary Microbiology, DGCN COVAS, CSK HPKV, Palampur, IN
1 Department of Organic Agriculture and Natural Farming, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
2 Department of Veterinary Microbiology, DGCN COVAS, CSK HPKV, Palampur, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 47, No 2 (2021), Pagination: 175-179Abstract
Field experiments were conducted during kharif 2019 and 2020 at Holta Zero Budget Natural Farm (ZBNF), Department of Organic Agriculture and Natural Farming, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur to evaluate the comparative efficacy of different components of natural farming on crop production and economics of black gram. The results revealed that yield attributes and yield (seed and straw) of black gram increased significantly with application of natural farming components in totality. Application of ghanjeevamrit + jeevamrit + mulching (T7) significantly increased the seed yield of black gram over T8 (absolute control) by 61.4 and 233.1 per cent during 2019 and 2020, respectively and application of ghanjeevamrit + jeevamrit (T4) recorded significantly higher net returns of Rs. 49265 ha-1 statistically at par with ghanjeevamrit + jeevamrit + mulching (T4) in 2019. However, in 2020, application of ghanjeevamrit + jeevamrit + mulching (T7) recorded higher net returns of Rs. 64206 ha over other treatments.Keywords
Black Gram, Jeevamrit, Ghanjeevamrit, Mulching and Natural Farming.References
- Anonymous. 2018. Agricultural Statistics at a Glance. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, New Delhi.
- Gomez GA and Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research (2nd Ed.). John Wiley and sons, New York. p 680.
- Kasbe SS, Joshi M and Bhaskar S. 2009. Characterization of farmer’s jeevamrit formulations with respect to aerobic rice. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences 43 (3): 570-573.
- Palekar S. 2006. Shoonya Bandovalada Naisargika Krushi. Swamy Anand, Agri Prakashana, Bengaluru, India.
- Siddappa. 2015. Use of jeevamrit and farm yard manure on growth and yield of field bean (Lablab purpureus var. lignosus). M Sc Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, India.
- Sutar R, Sujith GM and Devakumar N. 2018. Growth and yield of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) as influenced by jeevamrit and panchagavya application. Legume Research 3932: 1-5.